Back to Home PageThe following are examples of WEAR tests run to part's failure, comparing a variety of best selling motor oils and additives, "with" and "without" ANTI WEAR 1 in them.
When ANTI WEAR 1 was added to this popular motor oil, the time to reach engine part's failure was extended by 38 times compared to tests run without ANTI WEAR 1 in this oil.
When ANTI WEAR 1 was added to this best selling motor oil, the time to reach engine part's failure was extended by 10 times compared to tests run without ANTI WEAR 1 in this oil.
When ANTI WEAR 1 was added to this oil additive containing Teflon (a similar formula to Teflon based Slick 50, Nu Power, CD-2, etc.), the time to reach engine part's failure was extended by 16 times compared to tests run without ANTI WEAR 1 in this product.
When ANTI WEAR 1 was added to this oil containing graphite, the time to reach engine part's failure was extended by 44 times compared to tests run without ANTI WEAR 1 in this oil.
This oil caused part's failures so quickly the product was considered unacceptable. The moly was filtered out, then the remaining base oil was tested "with" and "without" ANTI WEAR 1. When ANTI WEAR 1 was added, the time to reach engine part's failure was extended by 25 times when compared to tests run without ANTI WEAR 1 in the base oil product.
When ANTI WEAR 1 was added to this popular synthetic oil, the time to reach engine part's failure was extended by 4 times when compared to tests run without ANTI WEAR 1 in this synthetic oil.